The Woman Who Helped Put Michael Jackson On Trial Later Faced Criminal Charges Of Her Own

Most people remember the 2005 Michael Jackson trial as the moment the world watched a global superstar fight for his freedom. What far fewer people know is what happened to the key figures on the other side after the cameras were turned off.

JANET ARVIZO WAS THE MOTHER OF GAVIN ARVIZO, THE 13-YEAR-OLD WHOSE ACCUSATIONS SENT MICHAEL JACKSON TO TRIAL. 

Her testimony was described by the BBC as “explosive,” and her presence on the stand became one of the most talked-about moments of the entire case.

Jackson’s defense attorney Thomas Mesereau tore her credibility apart in cross-examination,

Forcing her to admit she had lied under oath in a previous compensation lawsuit — a moment the defense used to argue she could not be trusted. Jackson was acquitted on all charges.

The Story Of Arvizo’s Family – Accusers Of Michael Jackson

JUST MONTHS AFTER THE ACQUITTAL, JANET WAS HIT WITH A FIVE-COUNT FELONY INDICTMENT. Prosecutors charged her with welfare fraud and perjury, alleging she had fraudulently collected nearly $19,000 in government benefits while hiding the fact that she and her family had received tens of thousands of dollars in civil lawsuit settlements.

AT THE TIME OF THE CHARGES, SHE WAS FACING MORE THAN SEVEN YEARS IN PRISON.

The full story of what happened to the Arvizo family after the trial is something most media coverage skips entirely. Some reports suggest that the court viewed her as a fraud and a criminal after her reality came to light.

The Arvizos’ Family Accusations Breakdown

Janet ultimately pleaded no contest to one count of welfare fraud in a deal that spared her jail time. She was ordered to pay over $8,600 in restitution to Los Angeles County. She later got remarried and has been living privately out of the spotlight.

HEARTBREAKING TRUTH 

Michael Jackson always maintained his innocence and was found not guilty on every single charge. The trial made headlines around the world. The criminal charges against the woman who started it barely registered. But the irony is staring us in the face.